Most damaging feature of class III malocclusion is:

 # Most damaging feature of class III malocclusion is:

A. Retroclined upper anterior teeth

B. Crowding of lower incisors

C. Deviated path of closure

D. Reduced overbite

The correct answer is D. Reduced overbite.

Deep bite is the most damaging feature of class II malocclusion. Reduced deep bite is the most damaging feature of class III malocclusion.

Most common site for melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy (MNTI) is:

 # Most common site for melanotic neuroectodermal tumour of infancy (MNTI) is:

A. Maxilla

B. Mandible

C. Ethmoid bone

D. Cervical spine

The correct answer is A. Maxilla.

MNTI is an uncommon osteolytic, pigmented neoplasm, primarily affecting the jaws of new born infant. Its origin is linked to neural crest cells. More than 90% occur in the head and neck region especially the anterior part of the maxillary ridge. They appear as rapidly growing, non-ulcerated, darkly pigmented lesions, with a radiographic appearance of an invasive malignant neoplasm. 

Dimensions of inner bow of facebow are:

 # Dimensions of inner bow of facebow are:

A. 0.045’’ and 1.125 mm

B. 0.06’’ and 0.09’’

C. 0.045’’ and 1.25 mm

D. 0.45’’ and 0.71’’

The correct answer is A. 0.045’’ and 1.125 mm

Face bow and 'J' hook are force delivering units of a head gear. The face bow helps in delivering extra oral force to the posterior teeth. It consists of outer bow or whisker bow, inner bow, junction, force generating unit and anchor unit. 

Outer bow: 

• It is made of round stainless steel wire 0.051 or 0.062 inch. 

• It is contoured around the face 

• It may be short, medium or long in relation to inner bow. 

Inner bow: 

• It is made of 0.045 inch (1.125 mm) or 0.052 inch (1.3 mm) round stainless steel wire. 

• Inserts into the round buccal tube on the maxillary first molars. 

Thesis Topic Ideas for MDS Orthodontics

 Thesis and research is a part of MDS curriculum. Here are some good research topics to consider if you are an MDS Orthodontics Resident.

1. Assessment of the relationship between maxillary and mandibular incisors in Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusions
2. Evaluation of the effectiveness of different treatment modalities for correcting Class II malocclusion in growing patients
3. Comparison of the effectiveness of fixed and removable functional appliances in correcting Class II malocclusion