Benefit of orthodontic treatment for patients with a pre-existing periodontal compromise

 # A key benefit of orthodontic treatment for patients with a pre-existing periodontal compromise (e.g., reduced but healthy periodontium) is:

A. Elimination of all PDL forces in the compromised teeth

B. Complete regeneration of lost alveolar bone and attachment

C. Increased tooth mobility for better functional adaptation

D. Optimization of axial loading to distribute occlusal forces more favorably

The correct answer is D. Optimization of axial loading to distribute occlusal forces more favorably

In patients with pre-existing periodontal compromise (e.g., reduced but stable attachment levels), orthodontic treatment aligns malpositioned teeth—such as flared or tipped incisors—to promote more vertical (axial) force transmission during occlusion, minimizing deleterious lateral or eccentric loads that exacerbate mobility, attachment loss, or alveolar stress in weakened areas. This biomechanical optimization, achieved via controlled intrusion and torque control with light forces (5–15 g/tooth), enhances long-term periodontal stability and function without regeneration, as evidenced by systematic reviews showing probing depth reductions (avg. 3.31 mm) and clinical attachment gains (avg. 5.28 mm) through improved force distribution and hygiene access. Options A (impossible, as PDL forces drive movement), B (not achievable orthodontically alone), and C (contraindicated, as mobility worsens prognosis) are inaccurate.

Potential adverse consequence of rapid maxillary expansion (RME)

 # One potential adverse consequence of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in a patient nearing skeletal maturity is an increase in:

A. Anterior Bolton Ratio Discrepancy

B. Apical Base Width

C. Mandibular Plane Angle

D. Palatal Vault Depth

The correct answer is C. Mandibular Plane Angle

In patients nearing skeletal maturity, the midpalatal suture is partially or fully interdigitated, reducing skeletal expansion efficacy and promoting dentoalveolar effects like buccal tipping and posterior molar extrusion (1–2 mm on average), which increases the mandibular plane angle (MPA) by 1–3° via clockwise mandibular rotation and bite opening. This vertical change exacerbates hyperdivergent tendencies, potentially worsening facial height and stability, as noted in cephalometric studies of late mixed/early permanent dentition cases. In contrast, apical base width (B) is the intended skeletal gain (though diminished); anterior Bolton discrepancy (A) is unrelated; and palatal vault depth (D) typically decreases with RME due to transverse widening.

Relapse due to late anterior mandibular crowding

 # A key finding from long-term stability studies following orthodontic treatment is that late anterior mandibular crowding is often independent of the pre-treatment malocclusion. This relapse is primarily attributed to:

A. A continued, anteriorly-directed component of natural craniofacial growth

B. The patient's failure to wear a maxillary removable retainer

C. Improper arch form used during the alignment phase

D. A rebound effect from temporary root resorption during treatment

The correct answer is A. A continued, anteriorly-directed component of natural craniofacial growth

Long-term stability studies, including serial cephalometric analyses by Björk and Skieller, demonstrate that late mandibular anterior crowding (developing or worsening 5–10+ years post-treatment) arises from physiologic late mandibular growth—a forward (anteriorly directed) rotation and elongation of the chin relative to the stable incisor apices, which displaces the lower incisors lingually against lip and tongue pressures, reducing arch perimeter by 1–2 mm on average. This process is largely independent of initial malocclusion severity or treatment modality (e.g., extraction vs. non-extraction), occurring in 60–80% of cases regardless of pre-treatment alignment, as confirmed in cohorts like the University of Washington Post-Retention Study (Little et al.). Patient compliance with maxillary retainers (B) influences upper arch stability but not lower growth; improper arch form (C) affects short-term relapse; and root resorption (D) shows no causal link to late crowding. Indefinite lower retention remains essential to mitigate this growth-driven tendency.

Dental Health Component of Index of Orthodontic Treatment needs (DHC of IOTN)

 # From a public health perspective, the Dental Health Component (DHC) grade 4 of the IOTN classifies conditions where the adverse consequences are severe enough to require treatment for health reasons. Which Grade 4 sub-criterion is most directly linked to the risk of dental trauma?

A. 4a: Increased overjet 6 mm to 9 mm with incompetent lips

B. 4h: Extensive hypodontia requiring restorative dentistry

C. 4i: Submerged deciduous teeth

D. 4e: Severe skeletal discrepancy requiring surgery

The correct answer is A. 4a: Increased overjet 6 mm to 9 mm with incompetent lips

In the IOTN DHC, grade 4a specifically addresses increased overjet of 6–9 mm, which significantly elevates the risk of traumatic dental injuries to the maxillary incisors (relative risk ~2.8–4.0 compared to normal overjet <3 mm), as proclined incisors are more protrusive and vulnerable to impacts. Incompetent lips exacerbate this by failing to provide protective coverage, further increasing exposure—though standard IOTN 4a criteria focus on overjet magnitude alone, with lip incompetence noted in grade 3a for moderate cases. Public health guidelines prioritize this sub-criterion for early intervention due to its direct link to injury incidence (e.g., 20–30% higher in affected children), unlike hypodontia (B, 4g/4h: restorative needs without trauma risk), submerged teeth (C, typically 5s: ankylosis-related eruption issues), or severe skeletal discrepancies (D, often 4p or 5a: functional/surgical needs but indirect trauma association via secondary malocclusions).