# A primary benefit of early orthodontic intervention for severely proclined maxillary incisors is the reduction of trauma risk. The most definitive evidence-based recommendation for this treatment is specifically for children with an overjet greater than:
A. Overjet greater or equal to 8 mm
B. Overjet greater or equal to 3 mm
C. Overjet greater or equal to 4.5 mm with lip incompetence
D. Overjet greater or equal to 6 mm
The correct answer is D. Overjet greater or equal to 6 mm
Evidence-based guidelines, such as the UK's Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) Dental Health Component, classify an overjet ≥6 mm (grade 4: great need) as a clear indication for orthodontic intervention, primarily due to the markedly elevated risk of traumatic dental injuries to proclined maxillary incisors—up to fourfold higher compared to normal overjet. Meta-analyses confirm this threshold aligns with a relative risk of 3.37 (95% CI: 1.81–6.27) for trauma in children with overjet ≥6 mm, justifying early two-phase treatment (e.g., headgear or functional appliances) to reduce incidence by approximately 50% (from 25.5% to 14.2%). Lower thresholds like ≥3 mm (B) or ≥4.5 mm with lip incompetence (C) indicate moderate risk but lack the same definitive priority for early intervention per IOTN and Cochrane reviews; ≥8 mm (A) falls under very great need (grade 5, >9 mm) but is not the standard cutoff.

Comments
Post a Comment
Add Your Comments or Feedback Here